|
 |
 |
Royal St George's, England |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal St George's Golf Club Sandwich Kent CT13 9PB England |  | William Laidlaw Purves, Frank Pennink |  | Justen Fiddler |
|
 | +44 (0) 1304 613090 |  | 1 mile E of Sandwich |
 |
Golf Club Website
|
 | Contact in advance - not at the weekend |  | Christopher Gabbey |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
| |
|
|
Royal St George’s was the first English course to host the Open Championship and is the fourth most used Open venue (host to 14 Opens) after St Andrews, Prestwick and Muirfield.
|
Date
1894 1899 1904 1911 1922 1928 1934 1938 1949 1981 1985 1993 2003 2011 |
Winner
John H.Taylor Harry Vardon Jack White Harry Vardon Walter Hagen Walter Hagen Henry Cotton Reg Whitcombe Bobby Locke Bill Rogers Sandy Lyle Greg Norman Ben Curtis Darren Clarke |
|
Country
England England Scotland England USA USA England England S Africa USA Scotland Australia USA NIreland |
|
|
|
| | In 1885, Dr William Laidlaw Purves of Royal Wimbledon Golf Club, spotted from the vantage point of St Clement’s church a spectacular piece of undulating land with expansive sand dunes. Being a Scot and a keen scratch golfer, he decided that there was only one thing to do with this links land; create a golf course. In 1887, the course opened for play and was named “St George’s” after the English patron saint.
"For a course that is still comparatively young," wrote Bernard Darwin in his 1910 book, The Golf Courses of the British Isles, "Sandwich has had more than its share of ups and downs. It was heralded with much blowing of trumpets and without undergoing any period of probation, burst full-fledged into fame."
After only seven years of play, in 1894, Sandwich hosted its first of fourteen Open Championships. This was the first Open to be played outside Scotland.
Royal patronage was granted in 1902 and the Prince of Wales (later King Edward VIII) became club captain. Many celebrated people have been affiliated with the club; the great golf writer Bernard Darwin was president of Royal St George’s between 1952 and 1961.
The course is not a traditional out and back layout. In a similar style to Muirfield, each nine is broadly circular, a loose figure of eight. There is nothing artificial about Royal St George’s; there is a natural look and feel to the course that blends beautifully into the surroundings, with wild flowers, dune grasses and the sweet song of the lark. Commanding views over Pegwell Bay and the white cliffs of Dover ensure an engaging experience.
All the holes are very different and memorable, a true sign of a great golf course. Royal St George’s also has some unique features; thatched roof shelters, the red cross of St George on the flags, and that bunker on the 4th hole cut into a huge dune, the UK’s tallest and deepest bunker. If you can carry that famous bunker on this 470-yard par four, then you can enjoy the peace of the fairway beyond, called the “Elysian Fields”.
The par three 6th is called the “Maiden”. We’ll let Bernard Darwin explain why: “There stands the ‘Maiden’ steep, sandy and terrible, with her face scarred and seamed with black timbers, but alas! we no longer have to drive over her crown: we hardly do more than skirt the fringe of her garment.” “Suez Canal” is the 14th, so called according to Darwin because; “many a second shot has found a watery grave”. The 15th is considered architecturally to be one of the most impressive in golf because the fairway bunkers are virtually symmetrical.
Some hazards are not clearly visible from the tees, but in the past things were much worse. In the mid 1970s, blind shots were considered passé, so Frank Pennink was brought in to ring the changes. Three new holes were built and tee changes were made to two other holes. Many, except for the real traditionalists, believe that these changes have further improved the layout.
Royal St George’s represents one of the most difficult tests of golf, requiring courage, confidence and solid ball striking. Severely undulating fairways make good scoring very tough indeed. Often the tee shot will come to rest on an upslope or a down slope, then one needs to hit a long iron or fairway wood into the green from an uneven lie.
Ian Fleming, the author of the James Bond books, was a member here at Royal St George’s. The golf scenes from the film Goldfinger were filmed at Stoke Park, but Fleming called the course “Royal St Marks” in the film, no doubt inspired by his home club. Like Muirfield, Royal St George’s is a private men’s club and there are no female members. Women can play the course as a member’s guest, but there are no ladies’ tees.
Sandwich is a classic links course, summed up nicely by Bernard Darwin: “My idea of heaven as is to be attained on an earthly links”. Darwin went on to become president of the club between 1952 and 1961. | |
|
| |
If the above course review article is not accurate, let us know by clicking here |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |  | | Average Reviewers Score: |  |  | | RSG is an excellent course. I like the uneven lies and the undulation. I must also say the final four holes are very strong but it is not the best in England. But quite likely a top 10 course in any country |
|
|
| 09 May 2013
|
Reply
|
 | | Royal St. George's is a luxurious dream for all golfers who wish to play links golf. The undulations in the fairways that meander onto a perfectly cut green. Every whole is a joy to behold that is enhanced by a wonderful view over the large dunes that is Royal St. George's. |
|
|
| 08 May 2013
|
Reply
|
 | | Played RSG in early November and found the course in great condition with the greens a good speed for November. The staff were very welcoming and the clubhouse is steeped in history. It was a privilege to play there. The course is simply stunning; I've played many links and this was right up there with some of my favourites around Britain (which include Turnberry, Saunton, Burnham and Berrow, Silloth and Royal Porthcawl). If I had to pick a trio of favourite holes they'd be 4, 8 and 14. I agree there are courses with better sets of par 3's but I also think there are no real weak holes on the course - on certain holes you think you've got the measure only to find there re dangers lurking near the green, or on the green with subtle borrows - all good features of a classic links. We played RCP the previous day .... good but not as good as RSG. Just a note: What I can't understand is why there are so many comments below concentrating on negative points. RSG is an old club and still full of old traditions so accept it, enjoy the atmosphere and play golf ... "When in Rome ..." or go and play somewhere else :) |
|
|
| 15 November 2012
|
Reply
|
 | | I must have missed something here, I really didn't rate it that highly, shame as I was so looking forward to it. The 4th, 8th, 14th are world class holes but the rest are just pleasant links holes. Probably the weakest set of par 3's for an Open course, Burnham and Berrow has got the best set of par 3's of any Championship links course in England. Don't mind the clubhouse rules and members etc : That is what makes golf great. 3 low handicappers playing off white tees all managed to comfortably break 80, none of us broke 80 at Weston Super Mare and one shot 91 Someone please reply and tell me what it is I missed, thank you. |
|
|
| 26 September 2012
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | John | 26 September 2012 | | Just an asinine review. The fact that you appear to be marking the course down because it afforded you the pleasure of breaking 80 tells me what I need to know about your values when analysing golf courses. |  | | Harry | 27 September 2012 | | Dear John I thought my review was a fair one, RSG is the top rated Club on this website and we visit many Clubs in the Top 100 and we did not get anywhere near the Wow factor here, I still gave it 5 stars. To me, you have to be totally challenged mentally( I know what you're thinking, lets not go there) and for an Open venue it was all too easy. We always get supremely challenged at Saunton, Burn & Berr, I even thought West Lancs had a lot more to offer. We look for enjoyment, fun and then challenge, we all felt it failed to deliver as the No 1 Golf Club in England. Thank you for your response. |
|  | | We played this course on a weekday in June 2012 and the course was in good condition and we played from the medal tees. The greens where very true, but surprisingly slow. The course itself is very interesting with a variety of very good and sometimes exciting challenges, but visually much less appealing than Waterville, Ballybunion or Lahinch. The finishing holes (16-18) unfortunately are quite boring and a bit of a let down. The staff in the club house was not unfriendly, but very un-welcoming. The bar closes at 3pm so there is no way to have an afternoon snack unless you want to get a full dinner in the restaurant with jacket and tie. It is the only clubhouse where you have to ring a bell to enter. The Pro was really rude - only his assistant tried to be helpful. After making a huge fuss about reservations beforehand, the course was not full at all. I am happy to have played the course, but for a whopping 175 GBP Green fee I do expect a more welcoming environment. They probably don’t care as they assume that most visitors will only come once anyway. Play there if you don’t care about hospitality and look for better packages. We lived in the Bell Hotel in Sandwich which really get a high recommendation – nice rooms, good food and a very friendly staff. |
|
|
| 12 June 2012
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Claudio | 31 August 2012 | | Played the course on Aug 2 and have to partially disagree with this review, especially regarding the hospitality. It was very easy to make reservations and to change the tee times. The Secretary of the club has spent with us some time for welcoming us and tell us about the course. The green fee is definitely a little expensive but I guess that is the same for any British Open course. As far as the course is concerned it was fun and enjoyable even though I must admit that courses such as Dornoch, Turnberry, Ballybunion, Lahinch, Waterville are definitely more spectacular. |
|  | | I played this course in Arpil 2012 and the condition was excellent. The design of the holes is nothing short of fantastic and I can't think of any two holes the same. You'll need to execute a huge variety of tee shots, approach shots and chip shots to make a good score on this course, and creativity and imagination are a must on the putting surfaces. Every club in your bag is likely to see some action with most of the par 4's requiring at least a mid iron approach. Watch out for the par 5 14th, the water hazzard is reachable with a driver off the white tees! I have been fortunate enough to play here 5 times and each time it becomes more enjoyable. |
|
|
| 10 May 2012
|
Reply
|
 | | I played RSG this week which is the 6th open championship venue I have played within the past year. The weather was wonderful as was the course and contrary to other reviews, we were made to feel welcome by the club and the members. My favourite holes were the 4th, 14th and 18th and the condition of the course was perfect. Although not my favourite open course (Turnberry and Lytham are my favourites) I cannot wait to go back! |
|
|
| 25 March 2012
|
Reply
|
 | | I played RSG but in December last year. Anybody from the UK should know that the condition of any UK golf course will be worse in the winter than the summer. I experienced true greens (not fast but OK) and a course that was presented as well as I would have expected for the time of year. We paid £90 with lunch and we experienced a three club wind and lovely winter’s day. The members we met were friendly and even one came and chatted to us at our lunch table. It was an experience that I will hold dearly as I hadn’t played RSG before but have played RCP and Prince’s. Even in the winter with average course conditions, RSG is a class up from RCP and perhaps two up from Prince’s. I could write an essay on how memorable the playing experience was at RSG but dozens of people have already done that before me. RSG is not my favourite links course in Britain, I’d have to give that award to Royal Dornoch followed by Muirfield. In Ireland I prefer Ballybunion (Old), primarily because it has more drama from a landscape perspective. I’ve just counted up and have now played 34 courses in the current World Top 100 listed on this site and RSG is in my Top 10 on winter merit. I think the comments made by the previous reviewer are juvenile. |
|
|
| 15 February 2012
|
Reply
|
 | | I played the course in November with a colleague. Having used this website successfully in the past, I trust the majority of the reviews. I have to agree with the reviewer below that gave an average rating. The staff and members are incredibly unfriendly which set the tone for the day.
As a member of one of the oldest 'members' courses I appreciate that the club is owned by the members. However, if the club elects to allow visitors to play, they should treat them with respect, particularly if you are charging in excess of £100 for the privilege.
The course was in very average condition and for links greens that normally stand up well in winter, they were incredibly bobbly. There are some very strong holes yet several very unmemorable ones. On returning to the clubhouse, the reception was so unwelcoming, we drove to Sandwich for lunch.
Perhaps St George's rests on it's laurels and Open history, but I will not be returning in a hurry and agree that Royal Cinque Ports is a far more enjoyable and equally challenging experience.
The fool below who commented on ringing a bell to enter someone's house should be blacklisted. Comparing paying up to £180 for a round of golf to entering a stranger's house is simply idiotic!
|
|
|
| 14 February 2012
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | El Gringo | 15 February 2012 | | It is reviews such as this and the one dated 22 March 2011 which do this site no favours. It would be far better to direct the main focus of a review on the course rather than club rules and unfriendly members. |  | | Hugh | 15 February 2012 | | I agree with El Gringo some people just live to gripe. At least RSG is open for visitors. Perhaps the whinging reviewer would prefer RSG to have a closed visitor policy like Loch Lomond or Queenwood? RSG is a links course from the very top drawer of links anywhere in the world and I think it's a privilege to play it and we should be grateful to expereince the opportunity. |
|  | | played it yesterday [29th March] in perfect conditions - not bad but certainly not 'great' - if you've been around Ballybunion, Birkdale and County Down [my top 3, in no particular order] then this is a huge let down and not fit to be mentioned in the same breath - front 9 has a nice pure linksy feel to it but the back 9 is lacklustre, with too few truly memorable holes - what really stuck in my throat was that we're still 4 months away from the Open and, already, 75% of the bunkers are out of play as GUR - how long does it take to prepare a bunker?! - worth a visit, but only because the big boys will be there in July...it doesn't, however, merit its ranking as 2nd among the English courses...I've played far better, but then that's just my opinion! |
|
|
| 30 March 2011
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Joey | 19 July 2011 | | I must disagree with the reviewer here. I find Sandwich to be the most fun course to play. I loved all of your mentioned top three but found they lacked imagination. County Down has the flatest greens I've played for a top links. Birkdale plays between the valley's of grand dunes. Ballybunion... well we all must love it!!! I just find the green complexes to be very interesting and, although the fairways are a bit severe, they are very fun to play from. They never offer a flat lie creating even more challenge. The front nine alone is worth the greens fee. Also, it takes a great amount of effort and time to create a reveted bunker. Especially with the size of some of those bunkers! I do wish everyone could understand how difficult it is to make them look that good. After playing Birkdale I felt the same way as the reviewer above. Lackluster, just because it's in the Open Rota doesn't merit a number one in England. Although I love them all and would love them the most after a round on any of them! |
|  | | I have played Royal St George's a number of times and agree with the previous reviews that it is a great links golf course. However, the club staff and members cannot be less welcoming. The club were incredibly selective over the time we could book and yet we barely saw another golfer on the course all day which is quite normal for a week day at Royal St George's. You cannot enter any part of the clubhouse except the changing room without a jacket and tie regardless of the time of day. Visitors are expected to ring a bell to enter the club - how pretentious is that? This is a real shame since it is one of the finest clubhouse bars in the country with great golfing memorabilia and historic references throughout. If you do not wish to change into jacket and tie you are ushered into a snack bar that resembles a motorway cafe. The members we did have the misfortune to encounter were incredibly hostile making us feel like we were not worthy of being on their land. The course is clearly being groomed for the Open so expect most of the bunkers to be GUR and the greens were recently treated so fairly slow. I would strongly recommend a trip two miles down the coast to Royal Cinque Ports where the members and club staff are delightful, the course is in excellent condition and the greens are true and fast. There is no question that Royal Cinque Port is a far more pleasurable golfing experience than Royal St George's. |
|
|
| 22 March 2011
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Steven Robinson | 22 March 2011 | | Dear oh dear 2nd best ranked course in England. 11th in Uk. 26th in the World!!! You have given it a 3 ball rating. My favourite course alongside Birkdale. Class |  | | Anthony Daniels | 22 March 2011 | | I played RSG this time last year and was blown away, as you will see from my review below. However, whilst I made no mention of the members or staff in my review they added to the experience. The staff were nothing but extremely hospitable and the members very friendly. Yes, the dining room was shut, but we knew that before we went, but we managed to go for a wander and had a good look around throughout the clubhouse. The members we encountered were only too pleased to take photos of us surrounded by all the historical memorabilia. I don't know what happened on the day that you visited, but personally I can't speak high enough of RSG and I can't wait to return in July. |  | | dan | 22 March 2011 | | OK, i will keep this briefer than I feel. We played recently and were of course fully prepared for having to wear jacket and tie in the lovely club house, but that restriction is of course the right of the lucky members (very friendly to us) who allow us to play their course - try that in the USA ! We were treated very well by the professional, caddie master, changing room attendant, extremely friendly steward and all other staff. Yes most fairway bunkers were GUR, surely expected in the run up to The Open, but the greens were fine. The fact that the course was well managed yet relatively quiet allowed us to have a very relaxed morning four ball and afternoon foursomes. My experience of RCP was slightly different in that the course was great but in the club house no-one said that clothing requirements were in place hence I had to finish my lunch on the balcony ! Both courses great but no need to draw a 3 ball distinction I feel. |  | | Ed Leaney | 23 March 2011 | | Bravo - agree with the review above. Last time I played the course in October the steward and the members were incredibly rude and unwelcoming. I also remember the difficulty my playing partner had in booking the round despite the course being deserted. We were considering playing next month but don't fancy paying £150 a head if the bunkers are GUR. Thanks for an honest and helpful review. |  | | Rich | 23 March 2011 | | Agree with the comments - as the original author suggested (and complimented), good course, but no atmosphere and very unwelcoming - I hope they sharpen up their act for the Open. Judging by the way Anthony Daniels jumps on any slightly poor review of RSG, he is probably either a member or the steward of the course! |  | | Richard Amadio | 02 April 2011 | | I find it quite incredible that any visitor to a traditional golf club such as Royal St Georges should expect the club to change their long standing rules just to please a few casual visitors . I imagine the bunkers are being reveted before the open and they needed protection . Most visitors to golf clubs know the regulations of clubs before they go there and abide by them .I personally change my golfing clothes before eating but then I always have |  | | Stephen Pook | 02 November 2011 | | Myself and a friend visited on two occasions in March 2011 prior to the club holding 'The Open". Is it true that some of the bunkers were GUR but that is quite understandable. The golfing experience was excellent. We also found the staff and members were perfectly friendly and whilst sitting in the bar for a post round drink, (in a jacket and tie as the club rules require), we were engaged in conversation by a couple of members and had an enjoyable chat about the club. OK, so the place is traditional (or a bit old fashioned if you prefer), but we found it to be a great all round experience and would recommend it to any prospective visitors. |  | | Ian | 07 November 2011 | | Would you walk into a strangers house without ringing the doorbell? |  | | Ed | 14 February 2012 | | I had a similar experience in terms of staff and member attitude and think it is important for visitors to be aware of this. Agree that the golf course is worth the visit, but my local driving range offers a better customer experience. I think Ivan needs to stay off the hard stuff - comparing entering a stranger's house to paying for a round of golf is pretty stupid! |  | | Anthony Daniels | 16 February 2012 | | I am neither a member (although I would love to be, but 180 miles is a little far to travel every week) nor the steward. |  | | John | 14 March 2012 | | Ian is an idiot - it is not a 'stranger's house', but a golf club open to visitors. The only reason you would walk into a stranger's house is to rob it so you would definitely not ring the bell. That aside, congratulations to the reviewer for actually stating what the majority of golfers have long since known - great course, but unwelcome club. |
|  | | I played this magnificent course on Monday March 14 and I'am still overwhelmed. It is absolutely fantastic. As it winds it way through the dunes you get to play all kinds of shots (especially from the majestic bunkers). Even though it's an Open course it's not overly tough for the regular guy. That is if you play from the proper tees and steer clear from the bunkers. The bunkers are on the other hand so cool that you almost want to take them on once every now and then. |
|
|
| 16 March 2011
|
Reply
|
 | | There’s an “old money” feel to Royal St George’s. Everything appears understated, perhaps comfy and rather familiar even to the first time visitor. The course appears straightforward enough but it’s not easy, even when the wind is light because the routing, in a Muirfield style, is excellent. Thoughtful, strategic play and solid ball striking are required to play this old links. It’s not my favourite Open venue, nor is it the most scenic or even the toughest but it’s a class act and I’m hard pressed to fault RSG in any area whatsoever but it I think it lacks je ne sais quoi. |
|
|
| 13 March 2011
|
Reply
|
 | | We paid £130 each for a day ticket at Royal St George's and we all agreed that it was the greatest day of golf that we had experienced. Having arranged our game in advance, we had breakfast (£10) followed by 2 two balls in the morning, lunch (very prompt and reasonable), then a foursomes game in the afternoon. Superb golf, even with many bunkers GUR in anticipation of The Open this Summer. The whole experience is 5 star, with very friendly staff from the caddie master to steward to locker room attendant. For me, RSG vies with the Ailsa course as the most enjoyable Open rota course. Must play. dan |
|
|
| 13 March 2011
|
Reply
|
 | Had the pleasure of playing this brute last week in glorious sunshine and the breeze fairly testing but not extreme. From the outset you can feel the history, the old school clubhouse and thatched roofs of the huts out on the course. Its tough but fair all the way round and if you dont have a decent game with you I can see how it would be a nightmare. Having played the scottish open venues this is on a par with any of them, and reminded me a bit of carnoustie and muirfield in places. There are a few things a feel that seperate these courses from the good, but not 'great' links. Bunkering is the first, every one cavernous and brilliantly positioned, not just dropped by the side of the fairway. The undulations are also key and add so much to the character of these courses and just make them so easy on they eye. Not just the natural ampitheatres that are created but the course management that is required. On many courses you can miss the green right or left without much damage but here you are punished and punished bad!
Coming from nairn, a fine track itself I do still realise the difference in quality of this and other open venues. Barely a weak hole on the course and the suez canal would sum it up for me. A par 5 that damands placement and the ultimate confidance in your own swing to avoid any OB the entire length of the hole, excellent bunker placement down the left and a green that if you bail out left is very tough to approach the pin. I would say only turnberry (because of the views), and kingsbarns ( because I dont want to feel like Ive gone 10 rounds with flloyd mayweather every time i play) come above this for me. Still an awesome place and we even found ourselves going out behind a very pacy jimmy tarbuck and sat opposite hugh grant who parked his ferrari next to our less glamorous peugeot!! |
|
|
| 27 September 2010
|
Reply
|
 | | Some full reviews in here explain this course well so I will not repeat. But this is a must play that will knock your socks off for weeks after. When the wind blows it will test your mental strength to the limit as this can be a real tough beast when it does. Bring your A game if you can. Brilliant. |
|
|
| 24 September 2010
|
Reply
|
 | | I might be a hacker but I can't understand the hype about this place. This is a one hell of a tough track and I agree with that. But being ranked that high I can't understand this.
Yes it is very historic, long and tough but other than that it is a pretty average links golf course. You must be very good to enjoy it and there is very little aesthetics about it. |
|
|
| 02 September 2010
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Simon | 02 September 2010 | | As a 'hacker' I would stick to municipal courses and leave the classic open links courses such as RSG to serious golfers. |  | | Ivan | 02 September 2010 | | Do you really think it would be in the top 30 if it was built 5 years ago?! I personally don't. Again, this course is good but it is not outstanding. And the main thing about it is it's difficulty. If you ask me Sunningdale Old is a way better course in every respect. And I am not alone in this opinion. Let's leave the municipal courses to those who don't care much about golf at all. |  | | Simon | 03 September 2010 | | You simply can't compare Sunningdale Old with RSG, they are chalk and cheese and require completely different strategies and mental approach. As to whether it would be in the Top 30 if it was built 5 years ago, sort of a mute point really but personally I believe it probably would be. Also I didn't think it was overly difficult either, I play off 9 and comfortably reached all par 4's in two and didn't come away thinking I'd been beaten up, but I respect your opinion and we can agree to disagree! Regards |  | | leatherwedge | 03 September 2010 | | Simon, is that not the point of these rankings - to try to come up with a ranked list of the 'best' golf courses, regardless of be they links, heathland etc? Personally i'm a links man but have not played either of these two courses, but am desparately trying to get a member friend to sign me on to Sunningdale! |  | | Simon | 04 September 2010 | | @Leatherwedge - I agree completely that this is the whole point of rankings, I just think that ultimately you can't compare an out and out links course with a heathland/parkland course which is why they polarise opinion I guess, but going back to my original point I fail to see how any serious golfer can call RSG an average golf course. |  | | Ivan | 04 September 2010 | | Alright, sir, thank you for your understanding and respect. I believe that I have not grown up to this course yet. Anyways there are no regrets about playing this great classic and I would recommend everyone to do so if he or she has a chance to. In any case there are no regrests about |
|  | Royal St George’s is not easy to get to and it is a fair trek from London. The clubhouse is not grand looking from the outside but inside it is an Alladin’s cave of golfing memories and memorabilia. The practice facilities are nice (driving range, chipping, putting, practice net) but then that’s to be expected at an open venue. After paying the green fees we headed down to the 10th tee, where we were starting. Warning to anyone who starts there: leave at least 10 minutes to walk there and make sure you find a path; we didn’t and had to cross patches of extremly tall and thick rough.
My view of the course and the experience will be somewhat warped as we played the course in gale force winds. Wooden benches were blown over, the flags were bending over at 45 degrees, my powakaddy was blown over and downwind it was pushed by the wind at a brisk walking pace down the fairway. Undoubtably this wind was far stronger than what stopped play at St Andrews at the Open. The course was in immaculate condition. The fairways were very hilly with many steep mounds but they were quick and firm. The rough was thick and it was only a hack out if you went in it. The greens were small and slopy. This made them hard to hit in this wind especially so as they were firm too (11 h’cap). However, it was a delight to putt on them as they were fast, exceptionally true and they had several interesting slopes and burrows. I found the bunkering to be the most severe challenge on the course. Many greens were surrounded by them and many were dotted around on the fairway. Although small they were not particularly deep.
I thought the back nine (our front nine) was nice but in my opinion the front nine was superior and some of the holes were just outstanding. That bunker on the 4th was something else and when i dropped a ball in there it was only a 30 yard pitch over another bunker to safety on the side let alone over the top of the lip. The par 4/5 5th hole was very interesting and the ‘Maiden’ reminded me a little of the ‘Postage Stamp’ at Troon. I preferred the front nine as it wound its way through much larger dunes while the back nine was mostly flat. I also thought the 18th was a little weak. I would have preferred it had the wind not been quite so strong (windy but not like a gale). RSG was a very good, tough course with some truly memorable holes and noticeably better than Prince’s. It certainly looked much tougher than St Andrew’s did on TV. I would warn you to check the weather before you play but it is certainly worth the trip. They also had a junior rate of £35 which was good value. Only complaint would be that the food stopped at 3 o’clock. I felt that it was a breakfast/lunch place. |
|
|
| 19 July 2010
|
Reply
|
 | | Played here in early May - conditions were very forgiving, a lovely sunny afternoon, not too much wind till later in the day and rough was only 6" high so I wasn't playing it at anywhere near it's fiercest, for which I was thankful by the end of the afternoon. The staff were very friendly,courteous and accommodating - couldn't wish for a better reception. Lovely understated club house, with modern and spacious locker rooms, super lunch - an proper jacket and tie affair, but not to be missed. It was nice to see many members walking with their dogs roaming free. I did find the signage a bit lacking from one tee to the next as you don't have many points of reference. The greens were a little lacklustre , but they had recently been tined and overseeded, but to be fair to RSG I don't think that affected my score negatively. I loved the par threes especially 3rd nestling into the dunes. As others have noted the bunkers are ferocious and discretion proved to be the better part of valour I chose to exit more than one bunker sideways, rather than take two (or more!) fruitless shots at the pin. I wasn't unhappy with my scorecard, but could see how the conditions had been kind to me and how differently things could have turned out, especially as the wind got up on the last two holes back to the clubhouse to remind me that I'd had a cushy day here. I really enjoyed RSG, but wasn't as blown away as some reviewers, maybe recent reviews had made me over-hype it in my mind, for me it felt like a fairer and much better conditioned version of Portmarnock (Old) - I'm not a massive fan of blind shots. It was certainly a great days golf, fabulous lunch and I will look forward to watching The Open there next year. |
|
|
| 19 May 2010
|
Reply
|
 | | I played RSG on a clear, windy day in mid-April 2010, teeing off as a single on the 10th hole. The course was in good condition and I found it to be a very straightforward and fair test. Most of the trouble was clearly visable, so my challenge (even as a first time visitor) was confined to executing often-lengthy shots around the fast layout (i.e. not guessing where the greens or danger lay). Greens and fairways were both firm, and well-planned shots were required to get near the pins. Greens were in great shape and putting presented a fair test of nerves, as many putts were lengthy and/or downhill. As is usually the case, a second trip around the course would have been welcome in terms of utilizing better strategy. I'll definitely make time for a return in the future. The staff was pleasant and efficient, and despite the stature of the course, I was never made to feel unwelcome as a visitor. |
|
|
| 03 May 2010
|
Reply
|
 | I played Royal St. Georges on the 22nd April with my father, despite being a serious golfer for several years this was my first real test on a bona fide links course and I was extremely excited about testing my skills against an Open Championship course and the variety of shots I would need to play.
Firstly the weather was perfect, bright sunny day and merely a hint of a breeze, to be fair we played the course in very benign conditions so the challenge was nowhere near as demanding as it should have been as it’s my understanding the wind here can be fierce at times, not that I was complaining! The clubhouse is unassuming from the outside but once you walk in you get an immediate feel for the history of the club with gloriously high ceilinged rooms and walls etched with pictures, honours boards and memorabilia spanning the last hundred years and more. The locker rooms were surprisingly large with excellent changing facilities and the full English breakfast buffet was both plentiful and delicious.
The pro shop is suitably stocked and the range facilities are excellent as are the chipping and putting areas located just off the first tee. We were unable to play the course from the tips but this in no way lessened the challenge ahead, having not played the course before we were at times undecided about where our tee shots should be aimed. However, what is clear was that the course was playing completely differently to how it will do in The Open next year, for a start my tee shot went right on the first towards the place Tiger Woods lost his ball. The rough was very short so I found my ball first time (as I did many times after straying off the fairways) so I will be interested to see just how much more penal the rough will be next year for The Open as I don’t doubt I would have lost several balls during my round otherwise.
The greens had just been seeded and hollow tined so they weren’t playing at their best and were a little bumpy, we weren’t complaining as they were still relatively firm and true and the undulations on some greens made 2 putts extremely difficult. The overall conditioning of the course was excellent and the par 4 4th over ‘Hells Bunker’ is a lovely hole with hugely undulating fairways which looked amazing.
One thing that struck me was how fantastic all the par 3’s were, I loved all of them and the bunkering on each of them (no bunkers on par 3 3rd to be fair) was brilliant and really made you think about where to place your tee shot, I don’t think I have enjoyed playing par 3’s as much anywhere else.
This is definitely a drivers course though and it pays be to relatively straight although as mentioned earlier the rough wasn’t anywhere near as penal as it would be for The Open, you also need to be pretty handy with your long irons too. I loved RSG and there are so many holes I remember fondly, the welcome from the starter and pro shop was lovely and we pretty much had the course to ourselves too so we played at a pleasurable pace and we’re able to really take it all in. We have vowed to go back next year after The Open to play the course at it’s peak (along with hundreds of other people no doubt!) but also because we simply loved the place and it has given me a real enthusiasm to go and play as many links courses as I can now over the next few years.
RSG deserves its place in the top echelon of courses in this country, any serious golfer will appreciate the blind shots, the sometimes unfair bounces on the fairways, the deep faced bunkers and the undulating greens – it’s a proper test and one I can’t wait to repeat! I just wish I didn’t hit driver on the 18th as I ended up in the fairway cross bunkers 300 yards away and my Dad laid up and managed to halve our match, not that I am bitter of course! |
|
|
| 27 April 2010
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Anthony Daniels | 27 April 2010 | | It sounds like you enjoyed it as much as we did a month ago. It's just a truly wonderful golf course. If there are 10 better courses in the UK and Ireland then they must be absolute world beaters. |
|  | I would like to start by making absolutely no apologies for the length of this review. The quality of this place commands nothing less than an essay!! As many previous reviewers have said, this place is the gold standard. If Birkdale is better, then I truly cannot wait to play there. Off the course RSG does it in a classy, understated, and low key manner. There are no grand gates, signage or big brash bling, and once you step onto the course you realise why – it doesn’t need it as the course speaks volumes as it hits you with a flourish of brutal and classic links golf holes. As we made our way to the medal tees on 30th March, the caddiemaster wished us luck in dealing with the four/five shot wind that is apparently not unusual in this neck of the woods.
The 1st eases you in to your round, but still demands an accurate approach if you are to score well. Then comes the short 2nd with a blind tee shot, if you dare, over two bunkers. Another accurate approach is required to a large sloping green. The 3rd hole is a magnificent par 3 with no bunkers. With the pin at the back it was stretched to 215 yards, the green surrounded on all sides by ominous and imposing dunes. Playing off 11 and with three pars to my name I was obviously on cloud nine as I stepped on to the 4th tee. Off the medal tees the line is slightly left of THE bunker. However, it just gets in your head and, although none of our fourball went anywhere near it, neither did we trouble the fairway. Again the approach is uphill to a raised green which has severe undulations and run offs ready to gobble up poorly hit shots.
The 5th is quite possibly the best hole on the course and requires another accurate drive (this is definitely a recurring theme around RSG, as is the use of the big dog) to find the fairway and avoid the six or seven fairway bunkers down the left hand side. The approach could well be played blind or semi blind depending on how well you did with your tee shot, and has to be played either through a gap between two dunes or over either one of them if you’ve strayed off the fairway. Once over/through the dunes there are no hazards within 80 yards of the green, although the run off areas will again scoff anything not hit into the heart of the green. The 6th is the second of what I believe must be a serious contender for the accolade of the finest collection of par 3’s on any course. Although it is SI 17 it is invariably played back into the wind, and when this wind is as strong as I mentioned earlier you have one tricky hole in front of you. Add the four cavernous sand traps and the narrow green into the equation and you could be forgiven at having a double take at the SI. Walk off with a par and be delighted. You’ve done better than I if you achieve this. The 7th is the first genuine birdie chance for us mere mortals. A 490 yard par 5 lies ahead, although a well struck drive over dunes is again required. If you can keep it fairly straight then you should be rewarded with a long iron approach to the green to leave you with an eagle opportunity if you hit a good ‘un. Don’t three putt, like I did. You won’t make birdie like that!! After a brief respite the 8th is an absolutely brute. A dogleg right of 419 yards, back into the wind, and with a carry of about 150 yards over rough to get to the green. A bogey five truly is an excellent score here as this is a genuine SI 1 hole. The 9th is another short par 4 but once again a good tee shot is required. Even a good shot may be made to look ordinary as it catches one of the steep banks that encourages your ball to topple away off the fairway and leave you with a blind approach. If this is the case then it’ll be more about luck than judgement if your little white friend comes to rest on the dancefloor as the humps, bumps and borrows on the green are almost as severe as further back towards the tee. A good shot only needs to catch one of these and it’ll be a very tricky up and down.
You’d better hope that you have scored well during your adventures through the dunes, as when you walk to start the back nine things start to get really brutal. The 10th is a rival to the 5th for the best hole on the course and, although it appears short at 371 yards, it is played uphill, slightly into the wind and the green is perched right on top of a dune. I smashed a driver and a 5 iron to the front of the green and managed to make my par. Others in my group who hadn’t quite hit their approach as well as me ended up 30 yards left of the green and about 30 feet below the putting surface, purely because of the severe slopes. In reality, they were fortunate to be there as the alternative would have been at the bottom of one of a pair of absolute chasms of bunkers that stand sentry at the front left. These are the sort of bunkers that require a step ladder to get in and out of. The 11th is the next of the fabulous par 3’s. Although it plays downhill and downwind, the pin was eeked out right at the back of the green and measured 231 yards. Needless to say I was delighted to see my 5 iron come to rest 12 feet behind the hole. Also needless to say, I was not so delighted when I missed the putt. And here’s the thing with the greens; they are slick and very very true, but don’t read too much into them. Instead, just pick your line and commit to hit. If you hit a positive putt it often appears that there is very little break, but if you hit a weak putt then the breaks that you thought could be there seem to be accentuated. I hope this makes sense. If not, I suppose the only way to see what I mean is to go and try it for yourself…….go on, you’ll love it!!
Twelve is a short dogleg right par 4. Along with the 16th this is probably the best protected green as it is surrounded by no fewer than six bunkers. One of these bunkers provided me with the opportunity to play what is the best shot I have ever played. Admittedly I shouldn’t have been in there in the first place as I ruined my cracking drive by fatting my approach straight into the biggest and deepest of the bunkers that guard the front of the green. When I walked up and found the ball plugged in the sand about a foot from the face I began to think that I may be in there for the rest of the day. Two of my playing partners suggested the only possible way out was to play sideways to the left. However, that would only have put me in another bunker next door. Therefore, I decided to be brave and aim straight at the flag, which was still the best part of 20 yards away. The shot demanded being struck as hard as possible with the club face wide open in order to get the ball to travel up six feet whilst only going two feet forward. If I could manage this I’d be out. So away we went……smash……sand everywhere…….pain ripping through my left arm as the impact of the club into the bunker face took it’s toll…….and then there was the ball……soaring through the air having almost lodged itself up my left nostril……it’s still flying……still flying…….it might make the green……it’s on the dancefloor ready to boogie……hang on, not only is it on there but it’s only 12 feet away and pin high. I thankyou!!! I think everyone can guess what happened next – yep, I missed the putt!!! Apologies for dwelling on that for so long, but I still can’t quite believe I managed to achieve such a result.
Anyway, moving on……. The 13th is the longest par 4 on the course but, like the 7th, is played downwind and should allow an approach with a mid to short iron if a well struck drive is played. The problem is the line, as it is another blind drive to a fairway that is not visible at all from the tee. This makes the fairway bunkers all the more hazardous. The green is split in two by a trench that runs through the middle of it. It’ll be a good two putt if your ball ends up on the opposite side of the trench to the flag. This green is also situated right next to the old clubhouse at Prince’s which was burnt down in 2008. The 14th is a monster of a par 5 at 533 yards and played straight back into the wind again. This is where you really get to test your ball striking as anything hit with a slight push, fade and slice will end up out of bounds and on the Shore loop at Prince’s. The burn that runs across the fairway shouldn’t really come into play as if you’ve hit a good drive then there will be no problem getting over it with your second, and if your drive was not so good then just play sensible and lay up. The OOB continues all the way down to the green and the left hand side of the hole is well marshalled by intermittent bunkers. This is an exceptional hole, amongst a course packed full of them. Fifteen is another long par 4 with bunkers in play off the tee on either side of the fairway. The green complex is similar to the first in that anything short and/or right will run off and leave a tricky chip. And so to the 16th, the last of the one shotters, and a beautiful links hole to complete the set. Bunkers seem to be everywhere and the green appears to shrink before your eyes as you tee up your ball and the wind howls down at you as if mocking your chances of getting anywhere near the pin. Once again you may double take at the SI (this is number 18!). If you hit the green, then well done. Of course, if you are fortunate enough (or unfortunate, depending on how much of a test you want) to play here with little wind then this hole would be a prime example of one which would become infinitely easier.
Just as you think you’re almost there and that things may start to ease up, then you come to the fiendish 17th. Give it a mighty swipe off the tee, another mighty swipe from the undulating fairway (if you’re good enough to have found it), and then probably a short pitch to the smallest green on the course. Take two putts and be happy with a bogey. Eighteen, another long par 4, is perhaps the weakest hole on the course. However, on probably any other links course it would rank as one of the best, such is the supremacy of Royal St George’s. The fairway bunkers are not as well placed as others, but perhaps this is just because they are placed in fairer positions than on other holes, but they still attract any tee shot not hit in the right area (ie mine!). As others have said, to need a par here to win The Open would be a daunting prospect. Fair play to the man that manages that.
Unfortunately I didn’t get to sample the lunch in the dining room as it wasn’t open. However, I didn’t come here for the food. I came for the feast of golf, and I left having gorged like a pig!! To have played my best ever shot on the best course I have ever played made it even more memorable. Had that shot been played on any other course then I would have had real trouble in remembering a lot of the holes. However, the sheer quality and variety of the holes made each one memorable. On reflection, for me what makes Royal St George’s so good is the fact that it not only tests a tremendous variety of shots due to the routing, the way that the wind affects each hole differently, and the clever positioning and horrifying nature of the bunkers, but it also tests the player’s ability to replicate the same shot over and over again, most notably by hitting your driver almost immaculately. If you manage to accomplish all of this, then you have a chance. But if this is the case then what are you doing reading this, you should be warming up for Augusta next week!!! Anthony Daniels |
|
|
| 03 April 2010
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Stefan Hindmarsh | 04 April 2010 | | Bravo! What a review! I had just reviewed this course two before you, and whilst you were playing at RSG I was at Deal. But I played RSG the day after! Can I just say that this is the most enthusiastic review I have read and to be honest right too! I was in the bunker on the 12th and I walked off with a 6 so well done for that! It is refreshing to see I am not the only mad man who raves about this course! Again top class review! |  | | Anthony Daniels | 06 April 2010 | | Thanks Stefan. Once I got going I couldn't stop! But I think that the quality of the place deserves such a lengthy review and I hope it may encourage one or two others to pay it a visit. If so, I know they won't be disappointed. |  | | Simon | 06 April 2010 | | Great review, very informative and enthusiastic which reflects very well on RSG. I am playing here on 22nd April 2010 with my father and your review has only increased the excitement I have about playing there, many thanks. |
|  | This course is the best links course in the world by a clear margin. We are golfers here reviewing golf courses, not hikers out for a stroll admiring the scenery. If this was the case Bamburgh would be number one and would remain there until the end of time. I concede that the surroundings are important but the ranking should be for the quality of the golf course alone. Perhaps an additional ranking could be introduced for aesthetics, the equivalent of artistic impression.
It can be incredibly bleak, which is of course part of its charm but on a fine day, with the skylarks high in the air and a gentle breeze, it doesn't lose much to the other more scenic courses. George's is a big, big course. As others have said it is possible to play a round without encountering another soul and several of the tees will leave the first-timer wondering in which direction to hit the ball. This isolation is quite unique amongst the Open courses and provides the solitary player with a chance to commune with his game and the wild surroundings in perfect peace. It is a driver's course with many of the carries presenting a formidable challenge even for the accomplished ball-striker and quite impossible into the sort of wind not infrequently found in these parts. The turf is of the highest seaside quality and unlike Birkdale, for example, the dunes are used - and how! Only Lahinch & Belmullet have comparable undulations.
I will make brief mention of the clubhouse although once again this should not be a component of the course ranking. The smoke room is the very essence of an established English seaside golf club right down to the matches in the brick frog on the bar. It stands comparison with Brancaster. Lunch in the dining room is on a par with Muirfield. Those of you, like me, who are wondering why there could possibly be eight links courses above it in the rankings, need to commend it even more enthusiastically to our fellow links aficionados. NT |
|
|
| 02 April 2010
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Matt | 05 April 2010 | | Absolutely - it's about the course, nothing else should matter. And I agree, RSG is a better track than Dornoch, St. Andrews and Carnoustie (the three links above it in the rankings that I've played). For me, Carnoustie's the only one that's close. |  | | Derek | 06 April 2010 | | You've raised an interesting issue about rankings and reviews. I can only say that in my reviews I try to encapsulate the whole "experience" and for me the setting IS an important element to that - second only to the quality of the course. The clubouse and ancillary services is much less important to me than the setting. The logic of your argument and that of the other respondee is that Turnberry, Dornoch, Kingsbarns etc would be no less worthy of admiration if they were plonked in the middle of a housing estate or a landfill site. Does anyone who loves their golf truly believe that? |  | | Nigel Thorpe | 06 April 2010 | | Before I posted this review I was trying to fathom why there were eight links courses above RSG in the rankings. The recent testimonies leave us in no doubt as to how wonderful this golf course is. I reached the conclusion that the others must be higher because of their scenic qualities. Surely though you wouldn’t knock venerable Royal Lytham because it is surrounded by houses or mark down that great east coast links at Seaton Carew because you can see the Graythorp landfill site from the fairways so why elevate other courses just because of their attractive surroundings? I think the feature that does it for me is the fantastic duneland at George’s – if I wanted to show an overseas golfer just what links golf is all about Sandwich is where I’d bring them. |  | | Tom | 20 December 2011 | | I've been fortunate to have been able to play many of the great links courses around the world. I've also played RSG about 8 times and always found it to be a great links golf challenge, wonderfully varied and superbly kept. However, I cannot concede that it's easily the best links course in the world. Pacific Dunes in Oregon, Muirfield, Birkdale, Royal County Down, St. Andrews Old, Kingsbarns and Turnberry can all make similar claims and can only be divided in my opinion based on taste or preference. |
|  | | Royal St George's has to be on every golfers list! I played it on the 31st March in near 40mph winds at times, and it even though at times I struggled to stand up and my ball was wobbling on the tee, let alone on the greens, it was simply amazing!
The course is simply the best I have played! We started on the 10th tee and what a way to start! A great Par 4 with a raised green, which in the wind is incredibly hard to hit!! Then you move onto a cracking Par 3 of 242 yards!
Then a great short hole, followed by three absolute brutes! Which combined total 1500 yards and they are two par 4's and a par 5!
Then the beautiful Par 3 16th, and then the closing two holes which if I am honest I can't remember much of, but the 18th tee is certainly a very daunting tee shot bunkers line the fairway, and I certainly wouldn't want to have to par it to win the Open!
The front nine though is in another league! The 1st with the thatched starters hut, and the dogleg 2nd, is about as 'gentle' as it gets. Then the 3rd is a brilliant Par 3. The green has two tiers and you play over 200 yards of rough to an island green surrounded by dunes and is the only par 3 on the Open rota without a bunker!
Then you enter the teeth of the course! The fourth tee shot is the most daunting with the most viscous bunkers on the course, and there are plenty to chose from…. The 5th is a amazing dogleg par 4 where the approach is played through a gap between two dunes towards the sea. The 6th is possibly the finest Par 3 on the whole course, and then the 7th is a birdie opportunity par 5. And then the 8th is the hardest hole on the course, a semi-blind tee shot, followed by an approach of 150-175 yards to a green surrounded by dunes and bunkers. Then the 9th is a solid par 4 where hitting the green, as with most the other greens, is an absolute must!
Then we ventured into the clubhouse, battered and bruised, and that was just the scorecard! However what a clubhouse! We had the best lunch imaginable in the dining room!
In all I cannot help but think the only thing that prevents Royal St George's from being No.1 in England is perhaps the views beyond the course, but then again Birkdale is protected by dunes so there too views are limited.
I will be back! |
|
|
| 01 April 2010
|
Reply
|
 | It has been almost a year to the day since I was fortunate enough this play this old English masterpiece, and I'm happy to admit to falling in love with it. So much so, that if I ever have trouble falling asleep, I will retrace my steps.
Like any good relationship it was not love at first sight. When on the practice ground, I was struck by the sparseness of the land. The dunes which become your playground on the front 9, were a distant but tempting view as a handful of members got underway. They turned out to be the only people that we saw that day, as myself and my playing partner spent a magical four and a half hours playing this wonderful links; pacing out yardages, stalking greens and generally treating the course as our own.
I'm tempted to say that the course starts slowly, but that's probably unfair on the 1st and 2nd, but the moment we stood on the par 3 3rd, the course really seemed to come alive. The run of holes which follows has so many highlights, it's like an episode of Match of the Day. My personal favorites were the par 4 5th, par 3 6th, the blind tee shot on the 7th. I could continue like this all the way to the brutal par 4 15th, which was playing into a slight crosswind which managed to stretch the hole even further.
I'm at pains to complain about the last 3 holes as I did really enjoy them and the challenge they provided, but I do feel that they suffer from the sparseness mentioned at the start of the review. However, when the stands are up, I'm certain that they would frame them better, helping to top off the holes which have gone before them. Whilst it's fair to say that the vistas beyond the course are not in the league of a Turnberry, the beauty within is simply stunning, and I found the lack of external 'eye candy' to be a positive, as it allowed me to focus on, what is in my eyes, a true 6 ball course.
Everything about my day here was more than I could have ever hoped it to be. The only negative being my concern that if I ever returned, how could I beat this experience? It's not for me to advise golfers to play here as I would presume it is on the list for 99% of golfers anyway. All I can say, is that I hope you enjoy it as much as myself and playing partner. One last thing, I would be interested to hear from people who have played here and Royal Birkdale, as RSG is lower than Royal Birkdale in the rankings. How much better is it, or are both courses in that top bracket, where truthfully the only thing separating them is a good honest debate over a pint? |
|
|
| 31 March 2010
|
Reply
|
 | | Very good course and test of golf especially when the wind blows. Played here on a windy day in march and found the course in very good condition, greens true but not too fast. Front nine is more pleasing on the eye, through the dunes etc, as the back nine is a little flat but having said that is the stiffer test if the wind blows. Better than Hoylake but not in the same league as Birkdale. Excellent par 3's. |
|
|
| 31 March 2010
|
Reply
|
 | | I played in November and found the whole experience to be amazing. I would put it up there with the best links I've played hands down. Greens were in excellent shape and very true. Don't miss it! |
|
|
| 12 December 2009
|
Reply
|
 | | The Gold Standard. This place simply cannot be bettered. Great location - secluded and very quiet. Select membership. Beautiful traditional clubhouse. Great ambience inside. Loved the exclusivity and the fact that visitors weren't allowed in the dining room. The course itself is top drawer. The front nine being the best I've played anywhere along with Royal County Down. Back 9 better than RCD but views not as good. Overall it edges RCD as my favourite. The condition of the course was exceptional, the staff and members very friendly and the two-ball policy as usual was very welcome. I played with my brother, father and grandfather and we had a terrific game of foursomes. The "oldies" beat us 3&2 after we couldn't get out of Bjorn's bunker. Best hole - 5th. High point was the glass of malt on the 5th tee... |
|
|
| 13 October 2009
|
Reply
|
 | | Proper golf. As good an atmosphere as i`ve sampled anywhere this place is pure class. As far removed from The Belfry, Celtic Manor, etc. as it is possible to get. The condition of the course was incredible,the bunkers perfect. Prefered the front 9. As a test of golf it was bang on .Links golf at its finest but it was the overall feel of the place and lack of crass modernism that places it fourth in my overall rankings. Superb. |
|
|
| 10 October 2009
|
Reply
|
 | | Almost 3 years since I played here for the first time, and that might sound silly, but I had forgotten how good it really is. Is there a better collection of greens somewhere? Only RCD has the edge for me, RSG being T2 with Birkdale, Muirfield and Turnberry in my books. All holes have something to offer, something always outstanding. Played in a strong wind and my goodness it was tough! Already looking forward to seeing the Open there in 2 years. RSG is stuck back in time, no lady members here, and they only just recently put distances on the watering systems (which didn’t please the boy in the Pro shop too much!!). The formality of the place might put some people off. But I know I’ll be back sooner than later. Loved it!! |
|
|
| 02 June 2009
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Andrew Evans | 21 July 2009 | | Royal St George's is without doubt the finest course I have played. I have played all the Open courses and many, many of the Top 100 Courses but none compare to Royal St George's. |  | | Anthony Daniels | 05 September 2009 | | I am booked to play RSG in March next year and cannot wait. |  | | Anthony Daniels | 30 March 2010 | | Well, I've just got back from my visit here and I feel like I've done ten rounds with Tyson. The guy in the pro shop said that the 4-5 club wind was not unusual. It certainly made it fantastically difficult. What a place. What a course. The best I've ever played. |
|  | | It doesn't get any better than this! Wow. RSG is jaw droppingly impressive. Almost every hole is spectacular and the layout means you are with the wind on one hole and against it next. THe final 4 holes are absolute beasts - I can't wait to see how the pro's get on in the run in at The Open in 2011. There are too many exceptional holes to highlight any, but getting successfully out of Thomas Bjorn's bunker was one my many pleasures on what was my best ever golfing day. We topped our day off off Pimm's on the lawn. Amazing. RSG is an experience not to be missed and my 19 pals all agreed this was the best-of-the-best. |
|
|
| 26 May 2009
|
Reply
|
 | | Tout simplement sublime. Avec le vent, on comprend vite pourquoi les cartes des pros ne sont pas si bonnes. L'ambiance y est excellente, les membres trés courtois et trés gentils, le parcours une merveille, ou chaque sortie dans le rough sera sanctionné...prenez le temps de regarder le ciel qui change tout le temps. J'y reviendrai !!! |
|
|
| 25 May 2009
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Keith Baxter | 27 May 2009 | | English translation of above review: Simply outstanding. With the wind, you quickly understand why even the Pros don't always score that well. The atmosphere was great and the members welcoming, the course is a marvel. Every venture into the rough will be punished. Take the time to watch the ever-changing sky. I'll be back!! |
|  | | It took me a while to warm to St George's. The course is big and intimidating and difficult, the wind can really blow and it can wear you out if you're not on top of your game (by the time you reach the 14th green you'd be forgiven for thinking you'd played a full round). Now there are very few places I'd swap it for. You have to drive it well but there are enough tee boxes for you to find your range. The real key is the approach play, as whilst the greens are large, the landing areas are often very small, and the pin positions can be devilish. The 4th is a good example - a lot of people talk about the perilous drive, but the real difficulty is landing it on top of the huge slope in front of the green and keeping it on the small plateau any where near the flag. The same is true at holes like 2, 3, 8, 9, 11, 15, 18 (9 is just marvellous). The rebunkering is good, they are proper deep, difficult, shot taking bunkers that require planning to avoid. If I have a criticism its that the bunkers don't offer enough risk/reward balance, esp on holes like 5, 13 and 18 where there's no benefit to going near them. The The real joy is that you'll hit every club in the bag during the round. The key to good scoring is your long putting from 60-100 feet, as the slopes are treacherous. Great course to play in winter as the greens stay firm and true but receptive. As at April 2009 it needs a bit more rain to be in good shape as the greens are still a little uneven following hollow coring. If you appreciate it is an old fashioned links course that is bloody difficult but a wonderful challenge then you'll never stop enjoying it. Please make time to have lunch in the dining room as the roast beef is worth the trip alone (and the snack bar isn't up to the standard of the rest of the club). |
|
|
| 09 April 2009
|
Reply
|
 | | I played here on an overcast and fairly windy day in mid March eagerly anticipating the test ahead and I must say I was not disappointed. Off the medal tees and with a 2-3 club wind blowing this is one of the most testing courses I have ever played. There is a good variety to the holes with some interesting short par 4’s, classic par 3’s with penal bunkering and the par 5 “Suez Canal” poses a plethora of challenges to anyone who is anything short of being a pure ball striker. Enjoyably most holes are played in what feels like isolation to the rest and the large greens (although still early in the season) seemed true and should be of great speed in the summer months. Highlights include watching your drive soar over the gargantuan bunkering on the 4th and the split fairway, par 4 eighth. I think I will have to play in the summer to get a true feel for the place as there was no definition of the rough and many bunkers were still G.U.R but in spite of this and the fact that the surrounding scenery is not in the same league as say Kingsbarns, it was still a fascinating test of golf. The pro’s will not get it easy here in 2011! |
|
|
| 27 March 2009
|
Reply
|
 | | Played this on Friday 27th February for £70 winter fee
16 degrees c and not a drop of water on the course, best day of the year and i got a winter rate too!!
When i got there i was hit by the charm and sense of occassion that this course exudes.
Very good service from the caddiemaster and i was directed to the driving range to warm up.
The driving range was immaculate and you can tell immediately that you are at a class golf course, it was like hitting off Greens!
I started off on the tenth hole and did not have anyone infront of me all-round.
The course was immaculate there was alot of work going on with the bunkers, to see the effort they are putting into these for the forthcoming open they are hosting really shows their commitment to making this a great course. Some of these bunkers are monsters!
My favourite holes were the 10th, 14th, 15th & 16th; the 16th has to be the best par 3 i have ever seen.
As briefly stated before this course is an amazing layout; the quality of the course makes it in a league of its own; the greens; whilst recently hollow tined were very true and very fast, i can only imagine how tough they can be in the height of summer!!
Rough was tough and long but not as bad as i expected in places, so long as you stick to the fairways you wont lose a ball! There are some blind shots and some real risk and reward shot options on lots of holes. There was only a slight breeze; i was lucky- no doubt that if there is a real wind, this course will be the toughest out there.
All in all i am overwhelmed at my time at this course and will re-visit to really enjoy it now knowing the layout.
|
|
|
| 01 March 2009
|
Reply
|
 | | RSG is an excellent Links course even if the British Open weren't played here it would still be one of the best examples of Links golf. RSG has sand dunes, rough, (rough and rough), deep bunkers, blind shots, strategic play is required, the bump and run into greens is almost always an option and you will find the short grass a true "fairway" with lots of bounces where some bounces better than others. There is a good practice area to warm up or practice the deep bunker recovery. The club itself is understated (which you hardly see in the United States these days). On a busy day you might see 15 autos in the car park it isn't a place of the tour busses and crazed tourists this is a traditional, classic club just as you would want to experience. The clubhouse is nice and the mens locker room is one of the most posh you will find in GB&I. Once you see the locker room you will understand it was built for the pro's. The lunches in the spike bar need some help for a club this nice they should offer something tastier, I can't speak for the dining room however I didn't bring my jacket and tie. The Starter is a character he drew me a map on the score card of where to walk and where to aim my shots it was very helpful as you can get lost amongst the dunes (not many English links play amongst sand dunes as you would expect which make this course stand out). The pro shop is well stocked with goodies to take home. But none the less the course is why you will visit and it is a real championship test. Bring lots of balls as the rough is deep and you won't find them strayed tee shots (at least during certain times of the year). |
|
|
| 27 February 2009
|
Reply
|
 | | A no-arguments "Cathedral of Golf." I have played this every year for the last 7 years (and Harry, please get booking for 2009). Usually we play in April but in 08 we played in mid-June. What a difference. The rough was punishing for having 2 more months to grow. But nothing can take the shine off this course. Every time I play there I love it a little bit more. Every hole has its own distinctive character. I have finally figured out how to play the 4th without being intimidated by the Himalayan bunkering facing you from the tee. But holes 4,5,8,10,13,15 & 17 are just tough links holes without contrived trickery. The course feels as if it was gently carved out of its enviroment. If it had the views of RCD or Tralee it would be impossible to fault. Top-notch...Tim Gorman |
|
|
| 25 February 2009
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Tim Gorman | 25 February 2009 | | I know this is probably not the done thing, but I forgot to mention the food in the dining room. Yes it is a pain putting on the jacket and tie, but the food that you will be rewarded with is worth the effort - better than anywhere else, Muirfield and Rye included! |
|  | | Great course and always in excellent condition. Much more quirky then neighbouring Deal and Prince's with quite a few blind shots, especially on the front nine. |
|
|
| 18 October 2008
|
Reply
|
 | | This is a great, great golf course and in my mind unique among the current Open courses. There are several blind or near blind tee shots and a blind second to the fifth which is more reminiscent of Prestwick than any of the other modern Open venues. This course requires first class driving skills to negotiate, and the first ten holes play through and around some outstanding dunes but the inward nine never lacks for interest. I found the greens and green complexes very interesting, especially the narrow eleventh and the devilishly sloped 10th. The steep right slope on 16 proved the ruin of Thomas Bjorn in the 2003 Open, and there are many similar challenges throughout this course. We were able to secure a day ticket to play the course twice, and if you have the means and the stamina I would certainly play this great course twice. The highlight of the club may be Doug, the caddiemaster, who served as starter, caddiemaster, course and tour guide all in one. Our lunch on the patio was excellent, and I recommend the Royal St. George's club sandwich, with turkey inside and a fried egg and bacon on top. Quite an unusual delicacy for a yank like me. Finally, the members we met were various gracious and even arranged for a ride back into our hotel in Sandwich. What a great, great day at a magnificent golf course and a wonderful club. Richard Smith, Knoxville, Tennessee |
|
|
| 07 August 2008
|
Reply
|
 | | when i played this course, there was absolutely no wind, which might explain why it was not as hard as i expected, but it is still not an easy course
i found this course real fun, and the holes were great, i just didn't want to stop playing i could never get bored
i imagine, that if the wind was up, then it could be a very hard course, but it is not so without it.
as well as this, their sunday roast is very good
i would recommend this course to anyone who wants a tough challenge, and is a fan of links courses |
|
|
| 30 June 2008
|
Reply
|
 | | Played here last winter and just about had the whole course to ourselves!! Extremely friendly, helpful and knowledgable starter. He drew diagrams of where to aim are tee shots for nearly every hole, just as well he did as you sometimes feel you can aim in every direction. Had the run of the clubhouse as well, which has a magnificent winners board!! The course itself is the hardest test of golf possible even with no wind. The bunkers are huge along the fairways and greens. The greens weren't the best as they had been hollow tyned, but had wicked breaks. Every hole is fantastic, this is a must play course. Can't wait to return. |
|
|
| 03 June 2008
|
Reply
|
 | | World class. Need I say any more? |
|
|
| 09 March 2008
|
Reply
|
 | | Played Prince's on the Monday and RSG on the Tuesday, while staying at RSG on Monday night. I grew up in America and have lived in the UK for 11 years and think this is my favorite links course. I usually forget holes on links courses, but can remember every hole at RSG because each had it's own charater in a way that is tough to explain until you compare it to Prince's (which is just the otherside of the out of bounds on the 14th hole). The holes were not unfairly hard, but you do get penalized for bad shots in the rought with a couple of lost balls and expect the rub of the green like any other links style course. A caddie is a must for the first time because there were some tees that you would think you could tee off in 360 degrees not knowing exactly where the fairway is. |
|
|
| 25 February 2008
|
Reply
|
 | | Played this on a windy late October Day. Fantastic experience but very difficult for mere mortal mid handicap golfers like myself. 4 holes - no points then suddently I began to hit the ball properly and four pars in a row! Bunkers rae a major defense on most holes (take your medicine in the fairways) and only one flat lie all day. In the end Iwas somewhatw eather beaten and battered but 28 points and the pure history of the place made the (very) expensive green fee worth it. The facilities generally are just OK (its an old fashioned club- proud of its traditions) - remeber a jacket and tie if yo want to explore. Pro and Caddie master very friendly. If your in Kent (I was on a family holiday nearby) any keen golfer would would regret missing the opportunity - if you can afford it! |
|
|
| 28 October 2007
|
Reply
|
 | | I recently played RSG for the 2nd time and I came away with a very similar perception as I had from my previous visit.
It has a very nice, old world ambience: Very nice clubhouse and many tasteful rewminders ofits Open Championship heritage.
The setting is however mixed: the initial holes that play away from the power plant are pleasant; however the views back towards the power plant and the pfizer faciilty border on being ugly.
The course itself opens well and has many outstanding and very difficult holes. I found the close (17 & 18) weak and somewhat of a let down. |
|
|
| 21 July 2007
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Carl | 25 February 2008 | | Relief is how I'd describe 17 and 18. |  | | Anthony Daniels | 02 April 2010 | | I would say that 17 or 18 are neither a let down nor a relief. 17 is a brute when played into the wind, as it generally is, and it has probably the smallest green on the course which is also a raised target. 18 is a little easier but you must still be long and straight. As another reviewer has said, I wouldn't fancy needing a par down here to win the Open. Fair play to the man that manages that. |
|  | | It took me weeks after playing it to fully appreciate it. The greens were large and true but very subtle. The bunkers would eat up your balls. The fairways meandered between mounds and at times you coudn't tell where u were going. its one hell of a test and a must play course. |
|
|
| 17 July 2007
|
Reply
|
 | | I played RSG in a howling gale. The front nine were not too exposed and I was 4 over, the back nine were mercilessly wind swept ... 12 over. The course is however magnificent and even in winter plays off full tees and greens. The greens were quick and true and beautifully kept. For such a prestigious and rather exclusive club the officials and green staff I met during the day were very friendly and welcoming. I have played some of the great links course in the UK including the Old Course at St Andrews and this is right up there with the best. It's pot luck whether you get to play in the wind or not but even though conditions were tough it was a day to remember. |
|
|
| 03 April 2007
|
Reply
|
 | | Played today in pretty strong winds, and it was good old fashioned tough links golf. I think handicaps go out the window when one of your party (of 7) who plays off a solid 4 handicap can’t reach a 500 yard par 5 with Driver, Driver and 5 iron!. I know some will say that you also have the wind with you, but I think RSG is cleverly laid out because I felt you played more holes in to the wind than with. We all agreed a very solid test of golf, and good value at the winter rate of £65 a head. Greens were very true and in good condition. The Pro and Caddiemaster were very friendly and welcoming, yes the club has rules, but hey ho, it’s the members club and if you don’t like some of their rules don’t play their course. Only my opinion but I didn’t find it stuffy or pompous at all. As for the overall rating I would have to say it is very solid and ticks all the boxes but has no wow factor like some of my favourites – RCD, Turnberry, Portrush and Kingsbarns. Also it is not as much fun as say North Berwick and I have to say, and some people may ask me to wash my mouth out with soap and water, I didn’t think it was as good as Tralee. Certainly doesn’t make my personal top 10. Also makes you realise how much of a factor aesthetics can be – maybe they shouldn’t I don’t know – but on a grey February day RSG is pretty grim compared to some of the courses mentioned above. |
|
|
| 27 February 2007
|
Reply
|
 | | having been at sandwich for the 1993 open i always wanted to play it and got to do that in may and thought the price was a bit steep but didnt care, i just wanted to hit a drive over the 4th and monster bunkers, the course was totally different to anything i had played and was impressed with the layout and condition, the greens didnt look great but boy did they roll well and the bunkers were very hard to get out off. the 10th is probably the hardest par 4 on the course and the conditions didnt help and the rough was savage, lost some brand new balls. clubhouse and lockers were first class and when my girlfriend walked into a lady free zone they were very nice to her, even if there was no one in the room! |
|
|
| 10 September 2006
|
Reply
|
 | | Dreary, Pompous and Dull. Apart from having wonderful greens and a few innivotive bunkers, this is not worth the money. |
|
|
| 30 July 2006
|
Reply
|
| Response: |  | | Chris Jones | 28 February 2007 | | Dreary, Pompous and dull - no way. RSG rightly holds its place in the Top 20 of GB&I. Dreary and dull? No golfer (regardless of how many courses you have played) could really ever mean that about this course. |  | | Jack Hammond | 21 May 2007 | | What? It is anything, but pompous and dull. The staff are wonderful and the course is one of the most exciting. He must have had an awful round: quite usual for a first timer! |  | | Carl | 12 June 2007 | | This is an idiotic statement whether you like links golf or not. Some clubs are modern some are old fashioned, RSG is the latter and is an interesting visit for it. Grow up and don't be so dreary, dull and pompous. |  | | Anthony Daniels | 02 April 2010 | | I think this person put their review on the wrong course. |
|  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|